|
Linux Weekly News posted an
article about Bill Gates' solution to spam—essentially, it's the
old proposition that charging "postage" on email will cause mass-mailers to
think twice. (The LWN article is subscriber-only until February 12, but the Gates speech was
widely reported).
I posted a comment on why the suggestion is idiotic, but I liked it
enough that I reposted it here:
I wish people would stop with the "email postage" idea. It is a BAD
SOLUTION. Ignoring all the problems mentioned in the [LWN] article, the
premise itself is short-sighted.
If we assume we can actually build this postage system thingy, and then
make the bigger assumption that it will stop spam without destroying the
efficiency and convenience of email entirely, what will spammers do?
Concentrate their efforts on instant messaging? Develop better software to
create weblog comment spam? Auto-dial our wireless VoIP phones and play
recorded messages? Maybe download advertisements directly into our brains
with our neural uplinks?
The point is that putting all of our effort into designing a system
specifically to tackle the RFC822 world would just push spammers into other
net-based communications systems, where we'd have to start from the ground
up to implement a totally new solution. (What's that you say? We'll just
extend the postage system and start charging 5 cents to make a VoIP phone
call? What a great idea! And a penny to send an instant message... Oh, no!
My Internet bill is higher than my car insurance, because I'm paying for
services with totally artificial prices!)
What we need is to create some sort of filtering or authentication
system that can be applied to all Internet communications, and
imposes technical limitations rather than economic ones. SPF is a step in the right direction, by
adding authenticity to the sender address and accountability for abuse, and
the concept can be extended to any IP communications. Once the offenders
are identified, it will be much easier to filter them out than when they
hide behind anonymous (and unaware) zombie relays. Maybe if the use of
public key encryption software was more wide-spread, we could extend the
accountability all the way down to the user, giving everybody the
capability to filter and blacklist at the level at which the abuse takes
place rather than indiscriminately blacklisting entire ISPs.
I wish all the hub-bub about email postage was refocused on a solution
that would last longer than the keyboard-oriented human-computer interface,
and didn't favor economically-advantaged users.
|