|
Over the past month or so, I've been trying to put together a new
platform to sit at the center of a SIP-based VoIP network. As VoIP starts
to take off, I'm unsatisfied with the current solutions in the open-source
community for providing PBX-like services for IP phones, so I'm trying to
figure out what a "good" architecture would look like. Currently, we have
SIP Express Router, the most popular
SIP proxy/registrar in the open-source world, the VOCAL service platform, which everybody
hates, and Asterisk, the
PBX-in-a-box that supports all the bells and whistles you could ever
need.
SER is a great product, featuring unwavering RFC compliance, strict
attention to optimisation, and good old-fashioned German engineering. It
has some weaknesses, such as the bizarre, half-baked interpreted language
used for processing incoming transactions, but overall I've been quite
pleased with it. Free World Dialup
handles almost a hundred thousand calls daily through a single server
running SER.
Asterisk is a PBX-like system, started in 1999 before VoIP became
popular. Its architecture strongly resembles traditional PBX systems, with
all signalling and audio from dumb user terminals (phones) running into a
big black box that performs all the processing. While this is fine if
you're still using POTS or POTS-like phones, but it seems silly for SIP.
If two SIP UAs are able to send audio directly between each other, why
insist that the media still be sent through the server? I have other
issues with Asterisk as well, such as the lack of scalability, but this
Centrex-like architecture bothers me the most.
The problem is that no other free VoIP product offers the features that
Asterisk does. While SER provides an excellent SIP signalling and call
control platform, you cannot find a powerful voicemail system, IVR
capabilities, or PSTN interfacing anywhere in the open-source world besides
Asterisk. This is why I'm working on my own.
The goal of the new architecture is to provide an open-source IP-based
platform that can accept and redirect calls with SIP, and provide
Interactive Voice Response capability on an RTP session. Currently the
system is divided into components that handle SIP interfacing, RTP
streaming, and call processing using an embedded Perl interpreter. All the
components are tied together using D-Bus, which offers
both remote procedure calls and asynchronous signalling in a
network-transparent way. Splitting the components this way allows the
system to be scalable across a server cluster, allowing, say, two SIP
frontends to control RTP streams from twenty backend streaming servers.
I have most of the components working now, but it will take some time to
figure out the right way to provide the Perl interface for call handling.
More on this later.
|